A construção da justiça restaurativa no Brasil e o protagonismo do poder judiciário : permanências e inovações no campo da administração de conflitos

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Pallamolla, Raffaella da Porciuncula
• Orientador(a): Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
• Departamento: Escola de Humanidades
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Justiça Restaurativa; Protagonismo do Poder Judiciário; Campo da Administração de Conflitos; Discursos; Práticas Hegemônicas
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7735

The purpose of this research is to analyze the construction of restorative justice in Brazil. It analyzes, initially, the processes of transformation of the modern state, democracy and the criminal justice system. It presents the movement of informalization of justice and its developments, such as community justice and restorative justice, as well as other forms of participation in criminal justice (jury court and victim participation in criminal justice in a broad sense). From this point, presents a proposal to classify the types of participation in criminal justice, based on the purposes of each participation forms. It also draws attention to the fact that the democratic dimension is not always associated with the participation in criminal justice. Subsequently, it analyzes the process of construction of restorative justice in Brazil based on the narratives of the protagonists of this process, the official discourse on restorative justice in Brazil and the most used restorative practices. It presents the trajectory of the protagonists, as well as reconstructs the context of the beginning of the experiences with restorative justice in the country, addressing, besides the pilot projects, the first publications on the subject. It also addresses the current regulation of restorative justice and the process of creation of the Resolution n. 225/2016 from CNJ. Subsequently, it shows that the development of restorative justice in Brazil occurs in two waves, where the role of the judiciary is the characteristic that stands out, although the character of this protagonism does not remain the same. It also analyzes the main characteristics of the Brazilian restorative justice, which involve the protagonism of the judiciary, the hegemony of the discourse of the culture of peace and the pacification of conflicts, associated to the practice of Kay Pranis’ restorative circles of Kay Pranis. It argues, finally, that the Brazilian restorative justice has a democratic deficit that seems to be associated with a tendency of Brazilian legal culture, observed not only in previous innovative reforms, but also in forms of participation in traditional criminal justice.