Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Clementel, Fabiano Kingeski
 |
Orientador(a): |
Ruaro, Regina Linden
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7301
|
Resumo: |
The present research deals with the institute of administrative probity foreseen in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and in infraconstitutional legislation. In order to investigate its legal nature, the doctrine's premise is that administrative probity is the subjective element of the principle of administrative morality or that it is a sub-principle of it. As a starting point for the gestation of the problem, we revisit the theory of principles in order to allow a correct dogmatic understanding of the legal norm, fundamentally of its species rules, principles and postulates. Considering the understanding of the content of the principle as a normative species, the thesis exposes, by choice - but without ignoring the importance of other administrative legal principles -, the explicit constitutional principles structuring, which guide the Public Administration, which are positived in art. 37, caput, of the Federal Constitution of 1988: legality, impersonality, publicity, efficiency and morality. The investigation gives to the principle of the administrative morality greater emphasis, destining chapter proper for its historical reconstruction. In this way, the research establishes the reason for which administrative morality, born with the theory of the misuse of power, was conceived, developed and created in France, until it reached Brazil in the first half of the twentieth century and consolidated in the Federal Constitution Of 1988 in two devices: art. 5º, inc. LXXIII, and art. 37, caput. The thesis establishes that the Brazilian Constituent discipline two kinds of administrative morality: the first as a juridical protected, the second as a juridical principle, being that in the last sense one is, as element or sub-principle, the administrative probity. With that diagnosis, the view is that the position that the principle of administrative probity is embedded in the principle of administrative morality is not sustainable. Thus, the research proposes that administrative probity has autonomous legal densification. To support this position, the thesis presents as vectors the positivation of administrative probity in the constitutional text and infraconstitutional legislation, establishing, from the figure of the interpreter, criteria that allow it to be recognized as a legal right and as an autonomous legal principle. |