Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Dall’Agnol , Charles |
Orientador(a): |
Barberena, Ricardo Araujo |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Letras
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/6141
|
Resumo: |
Here I propose a reading of two works of Brazilian pullp fiction, one by Ryoki Inoue and the other a short-story collection called Ficção de Polpa, edited by Smair Machado de Machado. This thesis has two main objetives: the first, to discuss the differences of the two lines of work in what concerns their styles and positions in the literary field; the second, to validate the study of a literature denied by the academy. Studies about pulp fiction in Brazilian Universities are rare and full of contradictions: escapism? Sensationalism? Mass Literature? “This is not literature”? Entertainment whithout sofistication? So, this is a peculiar and complex thind, pulp fiction. My argument is built against a division between “high” and “low” culture, angainst exclusivism, the main questions raised are: what is the pathos of the pulp fiction reading? What is the post-modern pulp? Is it possible to a pulp work to be studied in the academy and remain pulp? Last but not least: this thesis is written as pulp story, out of the clichés and the insolent poetry of the pulp. |