Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares da
 |
Orientador(a): |
Matsushita, Thiago Lopes
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6642
|
Resumo: |
When the 1988 Brazilian Constitution came into force, a new social-political boundary was established, conferring to the judiciary branch a huge number of constitutional powers, in order to allow it to act as a guarantor of democracy and fundamental rights. In fact, there is an explicit framework of dysfunctionalities in the judicial power, i.e., there is a vast difference between what was written in the Constitution and the judicial activity provided by the Judiciary branch, considering the legal possibilities and facts historically observed. According to data from the National Council of Justice, there are more than 92.2 millions pending cases in Brazil. In the Federal Courts, there are more than 11.5 million cases, involving paramount questions related to citizenship (dwelling, social security, health, education, etc). Therefore, the due process clause is revisited, founded in the principle of fraternity and Normative Legal Humanism, in order to find out mediation as a great alternative to resolve disputes in the Federal Courts in Brazil |