A conciliação à luz do princípio constitucional da fraternidade: a experiência da Justiça Federal da Primeira Região

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares da lattes
Orientador(a): Matsushita, Thiago Lopes lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6642
Resumo: When the 1988 Brazilian Constitution came into force, a new social-political boundary was established, conferring to the judiciary branch a huge number of constitutional powers, in order to allow it to act as a guarantor of democracy and fundamental rights. In fact, there is an explicit framework of dysfunctionalities in the judicial power, i.e., there is a vast difference between what was written in the Constitution and the judicial activity provided by the Judiciary branch, considering the legal possibilities and facts historically observed. According to data from the National Council of Justice, there are more than 92.2 millions pending cases in Brazil. In the Federal Courts, there are more than 11.5 million cases, involving paramount questions related to citizenship (dwelling, social security, health, education, etc). Therefore, the due process clause is revisited, founded in the principle of fraternity and Normative Legal Humanism, in order to find out mediation as a great alternative to resolve disputes in the Federal Courts in Brazil