Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Nicolau, Maira Ceschin
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Romar, Carla Teresa Martins |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5921
|
Resumo: |
The present study aims to analyze aspects of expert evidence and its peculiarities in the process of work, especially when it comes to production and value. In general, all chapters tackle the idea of the research developed over the work. The first chapter discusses the concept and development of systems of evaluation of evidence, particularly the current ruling system: a system of rational persuasion or conviction self motivated. In the second chapter, before entering the concepts inherent in the expert evidence, attempts to trace the concepts of the general theory of testing (concept, object, purpose), to later study of expert evidence, with its concepts and meanings. Species and classification of expert evidence are discussed in chapter three and four, respectively. The fifth chapter examines the actions and procedures involving the execution of a skill, with emphasis on issues related to the time of production of expert evidence, denial and rejection of expert evidence and the expert report. In the sixth chapter, we discuss the question of determinant power experts evidence in court. The seventh and final chapter, on the basis of the entire approach taken in the previous chapters and regulation based on legal, doctrinal teachings and jurisprudence, is exactly the problems and situations involving the need or no experience and also transported, faces questioning over whether or not the judge bound by its outcome, concluding at the end that in the case of the technical evidence, the conclusion obtained by performing the same force the judge |
