Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Caccuri, Adriana
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Peixoto, Nelson Brissac |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18245
|
Resumo: |
The experimentation of ideas and applied concepts led to permanent change during the elaboration of this work. While investigating the possibility of applying the concept of Multiplicities developed by Deleuze and Guatari, especially the Figure 3: rhizome book, on the creation of a book-object of art and its variations, solutions for the design and the speech were searched. A theoretical basis, empiric and symbolic, in an open and modifiable structure, supports in this work the unforeseen, trusting there is a human being that is able to learn, invent and self recreate in a constant manner. There s room for both the mistakes and uncertainties that emerge along the search path for an aesthetic production with the following query: the design of the object-book o f art and its variations may show up its shape and provide verification of concepts, criteria and values, allowing the flow of theory and praxis on the search for this aesthetic object, book-object of art, so that it can represent the synthesis of the two of them? On its organization, through the interchange between the creative practice and meta-linguistics, this research focused on facing the challenge proposed on the central question |
