Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Carnelossi, Bruna Cristina Neves
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Sposati, Aldaiza de Oliveira |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Serviço Social
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20492
|
Resumo: |
Access to money dissociated from the labor market, which is the purpose of this study, is addressed as a non-contributory social protection right in the form of income security right. We approached the perspectives of existing initiatives on access to money as a right of social protection for Brazilian citizens presented in three chapters. In the first, the demystification or the notion of labor as a hegemonic condition of access to money in a socioeconomic context governed by the fourth industrial revolution and through the immaterial economy, which is the chosen economic focus. Then, in the second chapter, the global growth of economic inequality and the growing need for non-contributory social protection in its income security format is the civilizing political focus used as axiological content which frames the empirical examination through the third approach of the study. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of historical forms instituted in Brazil, after 1988 Constitution, related to income security in the context of public social assistance policy. The identification of challenges to income security as a social and welfare right takes place through the empirical analysis of national provisions (Benefício de Prestação Continuada – BPC, in Portuguese) and the transfer of income from the “Bolsa Família Program” (PBF, in Portuguese). The logic of governmental management that preside these two devices, that operate forms of access to money dissociated from the labor market, paradoxically reiterates in their dynamics the liberal logic of the market, dissipating users of a possible contribution of right of citizenship. The applicant's needs, existence and experiences are rejected. Several revealing expressions emerge in the adverse conjuncture to the defense of income security as a socialwelfare right, under outrageous expressions of human dignity, the need for money to survive in the society of capital. This demonstrates the increasingly dramatic lack of protection that is exacerbated by the lack of access to a necessary standard of income security |
