Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Almeida, Fernanda Araujo de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Barroco, Maria Lúcia Silva |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Serviço Social
|
| Departamento: |
Serviço Social
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18040
|
Resumo: |
This research seeks to present a set of ideas to foster a critical debate on the Local Development. We start with the understanding that the Local Development is another of the expressions constructed by capitalism as a social-theoretical and ideo-political answer to their crises - exacerbated by the restructuring of production, post-1970s around the world. Thus, the Local Development is to serve the interests of neoliberalism. Put another way, the Local Development becomes functional responses of neoliberalism and meets the needs of the restructuration of capital in its phase globalized. To this end, we built two temporary trends of analysis that express the struggle for meaning in the field of Local Development. The first trend we call Field Hegemonic: Neoconservatism Postmodern can be taken as that built and defended by the UN and subsequently condensed in the concepts of institutions and multilateral agencies through the funding of programs and projects. Used as reference for analysis of this trend DLIS conceptions of methodology, discourse that was dominant in the insertion of Local Development in Brazil by Augusto de Franco. Thus, we intend to confront this trend by focusing the discussion on the theoretical elements that underlie the social rights and state responsibility in facing the Social Issue and their expressions so far stepped up and embodied in the new paradigms expressed in the formulations of the contemporary world grounded in neoliberal and postmodern ideas. The second trend identified by us involves the debate and policy actions present in the midst of the "Social Struggles" in the field of counter-hegemonic opposition to neoliberalism, with significant expression as the World Social Forum. Thus, the field of research included the documentary analysis of research reports produced by NEPEDH, analysis of documents published on the official website of the WSF, magazine articles and books on the subject, besides the report of research conducted by us in Portugal |
