Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Barbosa, Janaina Pires
 |
Orientador(a): |
Albuquerque, Helena Machado de Paula |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade
|
Departamento: |
Educação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10389
|
Resumo: |
Human Rights in Brazil has strengthened as a public policy from the 2000, when the National Plan for Human Rights Education (PNEDH) wasdeveloped. Its final version waspublished in 2006 for guiding the States to establish a State Committee for Human Rights Education (CEEDH) in order to develop a State Plan of Action for Human Rights Education (PEEDH). Educators carry out the implementation of the National Plan for Human Rights Education in the school system. Following that logic, it is therefore important to enable them in view of the constancy of speeches for equal and respectful treatment towards theminority and special needs students. This study problematized the Human Rights Education in formal education as a policy proposal of the National Plan for Human Rights Education, forming the universe of intentions of a human rights culture. The aim of this study was to identify the key concepts of Human Rights Education which are present in the course Intersecting differences: qualification in education, gender, race/ethnicity, sexuality and people with disabilities , sponsored by Goiás State Department of Education. The main objective of this study was unfolded in the following specific objectives: 1) contextualize the course within Goiás State Department of Education; 2) verify if the course respects and has the elements ofthe Human Rights Education; and 3) check the features, objectives, outlook, strategies, contents and results of the course. In order to meet these objectives, we used a qualitative methodological approach with documentary research, working with the course documents, the National Plan for Human Rights Education (PNEDH) and the Plan of Action of SEDUC/GO. For that end, we used the following theoretical framework: Candau (2007, 2008), who contributed to the understanding of Human Rights Education; Gimeno Sacristán (2002, 2008), who allowed us understandingboth the subjectivity built in socializing and the relation between human rights and education; and Bobbio (2002, 2004), who helped ushaving a historical understandingof the human rights; among other authors thathelped us building a theoretical frameworkto the proposed research. The research hypothesis, which was proven to be right, is that "Human Rights Education has been winning and conquering spaces for discussion and qualification since it was accepted as an educational public policy. Nevertheless, the actions undertaken inthe formal education are still modestin Goiás State Department of Education, thus not representing that commitment. |