Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Lima, Antonio Henrique Maia
 |
Orientador(a): |
Tótora, Silvana Maria Corrêa |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23277
|
Resumo: |
This doctoral thesis stems from a nuisance that unfolds in a twofold question: how to talk about resistance without resisting? Concurrently, how to resist writing a thesis? Therefore, a double movement passes through and throughout the following pages. The option for writing in essays and in the first person singular goes back to that double movement in an attempt to scape neutrality ("zero-point"). Nevertheless, this "I" carries the "we" of a group and collective ethic, as well as an expressiveness in a sense of composition with the nomadic war machine. The first movement is focused more on the researcher than the research and aims to carry the reader through the research and writing process what is called autoethnography of affections. The second movement aims to create a genealogy of resistance to the many faces of what is called State-form (of politics, of power, or thinking etc). Resisting the State-form supposes an active or creative refusal operation that can only be carried out by aberrant movements. From the famous formula of Pierre Clastres "society against the State", two fundamental sets of authors are handled to provide a discussion, in the environment dedicated to social sciences, on the potential of the proposal to decolonising knowledge, particularly in the territoriality of Lowlands. According to the classical separation in Americanist ethnology, Lowlands comprises the territories of the primitive societies, in which interesting social mechanisms of perpetual creative movements are developed. These movements operate as refusal systems or impediments to the sedentarisation of the State-form and the expansion of their gravitational zone. In this brief genealogy of resistance, it was observed that the game of forces for and against the State remains as intense as before. Besides the historical disputes, the very sense or effect of resistance is at the heart of the dispute as an object of desire and direct target of the State-form's apparatus of capture, legitimising a death policy based on an effort to exalt capital as supreme right. One of the many possible events was considered to demonstrate this process in the course of what I called a genealogy of resistance, the Letter the Guarani-Kaiowá Community from the Pyelito Kue/Mbarakay-Iguatemi-MS sent to the Government and Justice of Brazil in the context of reclaim of Guarani and Kaiowá traditional indigenous lands in the Southern Cone of Mato Grosso do Sul |