Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Graziano, Analucia |
Orientador(a): |
Diniz, Maria Helena |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8924
|
Resumo: |
In line with the idea of rule of law and consequent incompatibility with the irresponsibility of its members, the vast expansion of the area of liability is accompanied by the growing interest of society to find solutions that make effective compensation for damage. It forms new doctrine, concerned with protecting the citizens most vulnerable and helpless. It turns out that the increasing number of complaints begins to disrupt society in general, to increase the financial cost for the professional and the patient because of the increase especially in the application of more sophisticated laboratory tests and refusal to higher-risk procedures, contributing to a consolidation of defensive medicine. The aim of this paper is to provide measures to prevent the questioning of the patient-consumer for the health services used by it. Are brought to bear upon some criteria such as time, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic method for identification of medical errors. The consent form is also shown as a measure capable of preventing the questions, eliminating or reducing some complications related to relationship conflict or miscommunication between doctor and patient. In the context of public institutions to private, is necessary a detailed analysis of the legal systems adopted. So rich, the issue is not limited to the material aspect, so deals some specific procedural rules, which directly influence the demand indemnification, as the burden of proof. Case law and doctrine and comparative national basis and reap the practical utility of each issue discussed |