Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Reis, Bruno Miguel Carriço dos |
Orientador(a): |
Chaia, Miguel Wady |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
Departamento: |
Ciências Sociais
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4115
|
Resumo: |
During the last years, collective memory has become a relevant issue in the Spanish media and politics. In particular, because of the law 52/2007 being approved in the Congress that recognizes and extends rights as well as establishes measures in favor of the victims of persecutions and violence during the civil war and dictatorship. We began this research in 2003, before that decisive moment, studying the preponderance of memories of the dictatorship and democratic transition on the political and social consciousness of Spanish citizens. Especially, we focused the attention on the role of media in the meaning reconstruction process of the past within the public sphere. This study is divided in six chapters identifying the dynamics of media construction of the collective memory(ies) in Spain. The first three chapters describe the theoretical framework, whereas the following two chapters focus on the methodological explanation and empirical analysis of the study cases. The final chapter gathers the conclusions of this thesis. The first chapter presents the theoretical bases of the collective memory, reconstructed by a certain group or community. At the same time, it sets out and discusses the main concepts, describing the state of the art and covering the main problems from different theoretical approaches. The second chapter discusses how the paradigm of modernity, within the society of information, set out new challenges to understand our past and history. In other words, we studied how new technologies created new sociabilities and an increasing fragmentation of the social industry, becoming privileged spaces of socialization and symbolic/identity meaning of the past. On the other hand, in the third chapter we noticed an increasing proliferation of collective memories within a meaning of conflictive past, seen from the canonical perspective of history. Moreover, we reflected on how critical historiography recognizes this new reality and proposes a change of paradigm, gathering all that valuable testimonial information. Beyond the mere facts, what is important here are the testimonies created by those facts. In the same way, we explained how the representation of the past created by the media, as information or fiction, constructs a representation of reality that we define as media memory. In the fourth chapter we analyzed how the media construction of history promote the public debate, creating media memories negotiated by the audience. We constructed the methodological bases in order to understand how Spanish society perceives the representations of the past about the dictatorship/transition. We choose the television series Cuéntame cómo pasó because of its popular representation of the late Franco regime and democratic transition. The series analyzed in this research was used as stimulating for 32 natural discussion groups, already socially constructed and representing a certain collective memory. These groups were the result of an initiative of the Political Communication students in the Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC). On one hand, the inclusion of the discussion groups improved the empiric level of this research; on the other hand, it permitted to verify similarities in the debate and set out, through the Weberian ideal types, eight typologies of collective memories in Spain, defined by the sociopolitical context, generation and level of politicization. In the fifth chapter we described, analyzed and interpreted nine natural discussion groups corresponding to the ideal typologies developed in this study. Thus, the debates of the groups are the result of their interpretation of the dictatorship/transition starting from the media stimulus. On the other hand, we used a comparative method connecting the different discourses in order to emphasize more precisely the differences and the similarities of the various collective memories and describe the distinctive characteristics of each one. These methodological approaches (description, analysis, interpretation and comparison) were useful to determine the most common characteristics of the Spanish collective memories, according to the ideal typology presented in the sixth chapter, as conclusions of this PhD dissertation |