Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2008 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Mezzomo, Letícia |
Orientador(a): |
Naffah Neto, Alfredo |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/15690
|
Resumo: |
This study aims at identifying and analyzing some of the difficulties and conflicts felt by the authoress in the learning processes of psychoanalytic practice. It comprises both the account of her personal path in psychoanalytic formation and the problematization of the relations between theoretical and technical devices and experience in this learning process. The account is based on session records, supervision records, recollections and impressions brought about by these records and the theoretical referential of Freudian and post Freudian psychoanalysis. The analyses and discoveries about the difficulties and conflicts present on the learning path of psychoanalytic practice engendered a process of de-idealization of both the practice itself and the value of truth of the theoretical and technical formulations of the pioneers of this métier. The conduction of clinical practice is revealed to be based on an ethical referential, in the sense of sheltering both the afflicted alterity and the afflicted other |