Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Mengarelli, Rodrigo Rosi
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Masetto, Marcos Tarciso |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Currículo
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20729
|
Resumo: |
This research aimed to contribute to the discussions about the processes of Curricular Innovation in Higher Education. In order to do so, the Humanistic and Cultural Interactions (ICH) were used as an object of research, as they are a curricular component proposed by the Federal University of Paraná Coast Sector (UFPR Litoral). The pedagogical activities resulting from the ICH assume fundamental objectives for the accomplishment of the Political Pedagogical Project (PPP), conducted by the UFPR Litoral. There was a try to evidence, from observation, analysis and discussion about the praxis of the protagonists of the pedagogical arrangements, how these curricular acts of ICH contribute or can contribute even more to the development of the institution's PPP. Among the specific objectives there was a search for strategies to stimulate: the expansion of the pedagogical instruments for the action in this innovative curriculum; the rescue of the collective instances of discussion and pedagogical evaluation of UFPR Litoral; the strengthening of personal and conceptual relationships between project participants; the cultural interaction of subjects and their identities in permanent exercise; and the feeling of belonging to the collective constructor of an innovative project in constant movement. It was used the discourses of the curricular actors (teachers, students, technical-administrative and extra-academic community) and their different interpretations, idealizations, practices, doubts, fears, criticisms and everything that they were able to subjectivize from their experiences in the component of ICH. The discourses were obtained through online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews and were analyzed by Discursive Textual Analysis. What appears as a result of these analyzes is that there are important aspects about the ICH curricular axis that are demanding for pedagogical discussions. Among them, some arise as a consequence of curricular praxis and others arise as questionings, possibly resulting from conflicts between the curriculum and the General Principles of Curriculum. Irrespective of all the processes that have resulted in recent obstacles in the UFPR Litoral curricular discussions, the rehabilitation of these discussions and pedagogical formations as well as the exchange of lived experiences in the possible pedagogical arrangements existing in the ICH are necessary as an act of institutional continuity |
