Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Alvarenga Segundo, Paulo Fernando Esteves de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Yoshida, Consuelo Yatsuda Moromizato |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23333
|
Resumo: |
Selective collection, such as the differentiated collection of solid waste previously separated by the generating sources, is a public service which must be provided by the Municipalities, as holders of urban cleaning and solid waste management services. In Brazil and other countries, recyclable material collectors work in selective collection, whether formally or informally, accounting for the basis of the post-consumer recycling chain. In the city of São Paulo, selective collection emerged as a project to promote not only the change in the treatment of solid waste, but also the social and productive inclusion of waste pickers, for whom this activity was already their job and means of subsistence. This dissertation addresses these topics: selective collection and the work of waste pickers in the historical path of the administrative management in the city of São Paulo. The issues are problematized based on the way they were provided for in the legislation and legal instruments used by the city’s Public Administration in order to enter into partnerships with cooperatives and associations of waste pickers and with the concessionaires of public urban cleaning services. The themes are also looked into based on research in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo, with emphasis on the judgments of cases in which the Public Defender's Office acted. It is argued that selective collection is a public service, which is why contracts are the appropriate legal instruments to formalize their provision by waste pickers' organizations, instead of agreements, terms of partnership or collaboration, which are legal means of fomentation |