Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Vieira, Adriana Fachinelli
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Cunha, Maria Claudia |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Fonoaudiologia
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20848
|
Resumo: |
Introduction: Reading is an important practice to communicate and to understand the world around us, thus helping individuals to act socially actively and critically. Some researches indicate that deaf subjects have significant difficulties in reading comprehension. Objective: To assess reading comprehension in deaf professionals from a higher education institution. Method: Case study: 14 adult subjects, deaf, literate, both male and female, aged between 20.6 and 42.7 years. Procedure: Phase 1: Application of Cloze Test on a journalistic text with approximately 200 words. Each subject was instructed to fill in the blanks (30) with the appropriate words to the content of the text. Phase 2: According to the results obtained by the subjects in Cloze test, they were asked to perform a new linguistic task: reading followed by the preparation of a written summary of the original text.06 subjects accepted to participate in this phase. Criteria for results interpretation: the answers provided in Cloze test were ranked as: correct (identical to the original text), possible (other than the original text, but with appropriate sense), incorrect and no answer. A descriptive data analysis was held through absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies, in addition to central tendency (mean and median) and dispersion (standard deviation, minimum and maximum) measures. The summarized texts were qualitatively analyzed with the following criteria: time spent, understanding of the essential content, understanding of complementary content, and inclusion of personal opinions. Results: Most of the subjects obtained scores significantly below compared to the maximum total score (60 points) of the Cloze test. Of the 6 phase 2 participants, only one did not included essential information in the summary of the text. Conclusion: the performance in reading comprehension, in deaf subjects enrolled, is hampered by the formal (morphological and syntactic) aspects of the linguistic code demanded by Cloze test; and favored by semantic and pragmatic aspects used to elaborate written summaries |
