Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Franco, Fernanda Santini
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Szymanski, Heloisa |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação
|
| Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16168
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this study was to understand and show/clarify the dialogical and emancipating practices that sustain/ support the work with parents and educators in the construction and exchanging educational knowledge in a multipliers training course for educational study/work with families, led by Ecofam Group from PUC- SP. We identify nowadays a demand for a knowledge based on experience, different from the functional objective and pragmatic knowledge that prevails in the Western tradition. Relying on references and phenomenological thought of Paulo Freire a hermeneutic analysis was done with multipliers, performed/ carried out on a course of two years/ during a length of two years of studies/ during a period of two years. The result, described the changes in all participants and identified aspects that allowed such changes. Multipliers and parents had initial difficulties to understand the dialogical practices, but along the way/ but overtime they showed the development of a more autonomous attitude with the spontaneous creation of critical and substantiated interventions to education and community issues. The researchers needed to deal with the loss/ to deal with the breakdown of their initial expectations, making a constant review of their practices and proposals and presenting an opening for alterations/ for modifications only possible with a permanent contact with the principles that guided/ that shaped this work. For these changes, it was considered as fundamental aspects, a close relationship between doing and thinking and the possibility of experiencing the concepts presented in a theory , besides that, the confidence that the multipliers could think and act as critical and reflective people. It was always essential to have the visions of the human being/ man , world and education that guide the choices of actions during the course. The dialogue was seen as a tool for the construction and exchange of a knowledge in a perspective different to the reproduction of technical naturalized knowledge |
