Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Neves, Galciani
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Salles, Cecilia Almeida |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Comunicação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4611
|
Resumo: |
The present study approaches communicational resources and procedures on the production of Brazilian Art critics, attempting to minimise the great gap and absence of debate around such activity in this country. In Brazil, the critique crisis became a grand cliche. Modes of approaching and mediating artistic events were investigated, as well as public debates on the press, analysis of criteria specially during the 60 s and 70 s. At this time it was possible to perceive a plethora of transformations in the critique and in the professionalization process as well as much diversification in the critic s tasks within institutions, universities, art market, media. Aracy Amaral, Frederico Morais, Ronaldo Brito, Paulo Sergio Duarte, Annateresa Fabris, Paulo Venâncio Filho, Fernando Cocchiarale, Gloria Ferreira, Tadeu Chiarelli, Cristina Freire, Marcio Doctors, Mônica Zielinsky, Maria Amélia Bulhões, Sônia Salzstein were all interviewed ans studied under the light of their processes. These author-subjects talked about their experiences, ways of behave, references, position towards art, culture, politics. They spoke about the dialogues they established with the surroundings, contact with artists, experiences with art, as well as telling about their relationship with Art History and the critique itself, instruments of analysis. Under the Process Critique perspective, proposed by Cecilia Salles based on the Semiotics of Charles Sanders Peirce in dialogue with the concept of net proposed by Pierre Musso it was possible to discuss art critique as a sign process extremely marked by communicational issues in a broaden net of connections. Self-refexive and critical thinking, intertwined components of such a net, and understood in their constructive movement, became foundations for the eleven fields of critical procedures in which the communicative dimension of art in a number of directions is made evident: from the critic and their action contexts, in talks with artists and readers, as a perceptive experience when facing the works, as expansion and development of the work, to the public debate. In doing so, this study proposes an understanding of art critique in its complex reality and constant transformation as a creative and inventive exercise an act of communication |
