Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Cassiari, Edna Ribeiro
 |
Orientador(a): |
Silva, Maria José Ferreira da |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação Matemática
|
Departamento: |
Educação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10876
|
Resumo: |
This study aimed to identify possible strengths and weaknesses in implementing the "Teacher's Notebook" and "Student Notebook" Network State of São Paulo. These books include the Curriculum Proposal implemented in 2008, being the teacher's role important for this implementation. So, we take a look back to this professional. Thus, we seek to answer the research question: What are the possible strengths and weaknesses in implementing the "Teacher's Notebook" and "Student Notebook" Network State of Sao Paulo, we can identify through the teacher? To answer it, we apply a diagnostic tool in the form of a questionnaire to 63 teachers of mathematics at the Public Office of the State of São Paulo. By having the data collected, there were two forms of analysis: first, we examined each variable for those parts B and C of the questionnaire, the second was based on the similarity tree, constructed by the CHIC software.The study was directed to a qualitative approach, and in the analysis, we compare the data collected as it is mentioned in the support material of cited notebooks. It was possible to identify potentialities, among them: the unification of the curriculum, the material helps in the planning and school management, enables the increase of knowledge of the teacher, effective teachers who attend the Master course showed better acceptance of the materials provided, most teachers considered that the idea of using the material is good, and almost all respondents indicated that the material should not be abolished, even after considering the various weaknesses exposed. Among these, we highlight: the acceptance of material by the students was not satisfactory, the lack of prior knowledge of the student was one of the most mentioned reasons for not using the material, and the support provided for the teacher happens superficially |