Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2008 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Wolf, Fábio
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
Cavenaghi-Lessa, Angela |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13975
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation aims at investigating (1) the discursive identity of a History teacher in relation to hegemonic discourses in education and 2) reflect critically, through reflective sessions, about the possibilities of construction of critical discussion´s spaces in the classroom in the direction of rethinking, problematizing and contesting the current hegemonic trends in the educational field. This study was carried out in a critical and socio-historical perspective of language and education (Freire, 1987; Vygotsky, 2001; Pennycook, 2001; Rajagopalan, 2003). It aims, thus, at the formation of critical/reflective agents able to transform their contexts of practices through the construction of a self-affirmative and counter-hegemonic language. This study was carried out in a state school of the east zone of São Paulo and counted on the participation of a History teacher who teaches in this institution. Four classes and two reflective sessions with the research´s participant were recorded. The data were analyzed according to the category of thematic content (Bronckart, 1999), and the conversational turns and types of questions (Marchuschi, 2001). The results obtained suggest that the creation of critical reflection spaces in the classroom can be constituents of important instruments for the transformation of the dominant status quo, considering that the subjects involved, gradually, recognize themselves as socio-historical agents responsible for the creation and reconstruction of the world and their lives based on the construction of a resistance language |