Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2008 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Vasconcellos Filho, Miguel de Frias e
 |
Orientador(a): |
Baptista, Ana Maria Haddad |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em História da Ciência
|
Departamento: |
História da Ciência
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13404
|
Resumo: |
This paper rises an epistemological discussion, based in point of view of thinkers about perception, thoughts and intuition, mainly starting in Gaston Bachelard s analysis, envolving Art and Science. This paper, without intention to get answers, tried to make an artist-work-thinkers relation, started in search of comprehension of doubts and unrests, during the elaboration of Paul Cézanne s work (1839-1906), a name well-known, respected and considered in art universe, mainly found in letters wrote to his friend and confident Émile Bernard, to his son Paul; based in close person s narratives like Vollard s, and from impressions and percepcions of Rainer Maria Rilk, poet an art observer, which after know the Cézanne art, began a detailedly analysis. As oposition, was used the point of view of scientists accustomed with straightness of racional thought |