Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Bandeira, Denise Adriana
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Trivinho, Eugênio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Comunicação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4411
|
Resumo: |
This thesis involved a critical discussion and reflection about the institutionalization and design of a digital art system, and hence, a regime. The purpose of most of the investigation was to map and compare a given configuration of this artistic field according to the criteria of Bourdieu (1982, 1996, 1998, 2004). Therefore, it involved identifying a set of institutions and agents, in a situation of differentiation and multiplication, as well as symptoms of the composition of an artistic field. To this end, two moments were considered: antecedents or the moment of emergence, between 2000 and 2005, and autonomy, from 2005 to 2010. With regard to the concepts examined in the overall research, our choice fell on the theoretical framework developed in the logic of cybercultural dromocracy, and particularly, the concept of transpolitics authored by Trivinho (1998, 2001a, 2007), as well as aspects of the argumentation of Virilio (1984, 1996, 2005). An initial processual and empirical survey of forums and sites, as well as themes debated in discussion lists and qualified as mediatic channels, contributed to demarcate a taxonomy during the emergence of the field of digital art. In the course of these investigative phases, different research methodologies were studied and compared: qualitative, quantitative, and with automated processes applied to the Internet and online databases (particularly of semantic networks). This was followed by a discussion of aspects of the institutionalization of digital art, represented by an objective structure of the social space, and especially, by an information technology infrastructure, according to the modus operandi of cybercultural dromocracy and the transpolitical condition (TRIVINHO, 2007). Many of these communication arrangements and artistic practices occurred virtually and were intercalated with face-to-face communications at events in the area and publicized in printed publications, in a typical combination of cyberculture between events and online processes and other facts in an off-line context. Within the ambit of these manifestations, the Ars Electronica (Linz, Austria) festival was selected as exemplary, considering its role as an instance of recognition of institutionalization in the field of digital art, especially with regard to the positions of agents and institutions. In this phase, we adopted a comparative methodology with respect to the structures of the system of traditional art (BOURDIEU, 1982, 1989, 1996, 2003a; 2004), and particularly of contemporary art (CAUQUELIN, 2005a, 2005b). Lastly, this thesis analyzes the institutionalization of digital art by broadly suggesting the constitution of the field of digital art in cyberculture, without encroaching on boundaries, in view of the different states and frameworks shared internationally |
