A função social como agente limitador-conformativo da propriedade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2007
Autor(a) principal: Lupo, Rogerio Russo
Orientador(a): Alvim, Arruda
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7857
Resumo: This essay aims at illustrating the evolution of the legal concept of Property, from Ancient times to present. To demonstrate this, it analyzes the chronology and the historical evolution of Property until the contemporary concept of social function of Property. The study of the social function of Property consists of its concept, historical and constitutional evolution, limitations, beneficiaries and regulation upon the enactment of the 2002 Brazilian Civil Code. The legal institute of the social function of Property is based on the right to freedom, as it is normally interpreted, and focuses on the purpose of allowing access to the use of property, concerning not only the development of a person s welfare but also her human dignity. Thus, it will be demonstrate that the absolutism prevailing in ancient Property laws, which has been losing ground and nowadays has a different meaning, now focuses on the objective to be given to Property. Certainly, the applicable laws, specially the 2002 Brazilian Civil Code and the 1988 Federal Constitution of 1988, established hypothesis and limits to the applicability of the social function of Property, which precluded both a chaotic situation and an absolute anarchic state. Finally, it is worth pointing out that the 2002 Brazilian Civil Code has incorporated the new concept of property, which represents a complex legal relationship, full of rights and duties, and which focuses primarily on the fulfillment of its social function. Several innovations, such as the loss of Property upon the indemnification to third persons, who, by taking possession of the land, end up granting a social function to such property, the abandonment and the seizing of the res by the State, the new statute of limitations and forms of ownership resulting from adverse possession, as well as the new rules regarding easements ensure a new form of Property law, which complies with the prevailing constitutional principles