Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Ferreira, Marcos Pitanga Caeté
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Oliveira Neto, Olavo de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21990
|
Resumo: |
The study of the procedural effects of the assignment of the litigious rights during the litigation proceeding, due to inter vivos act, is the object and central subject of the present Dissertation. Although understudied by the procedural doctrine, the matter in question is regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure, 2015, in terms very similar to what already occurred under the aegis of procedural legislation, 1973. The discussions about the permissibility of the sub judice transfer of assets, rights and claims, it is worth saying, had its origins in the Roman law and have evolved over the centuries through the most different rules, which, in summary, seek to make compatible the events held within the scope of the substantive law (the transfer of the right) within the civil procedure (i.e. the endo-procedural reflexes of such transfer). The adoption of the theory of the relevance mitigated by the main legal rules throughout the world, also accepted by the Brazilian Law, precisely sought to make compatible the permissibility of circulation of the goods with the mitigation of the procedural issues that might arise from such event. In short and in summary, the solution adopted tends to protect the other party that did not participate in the act of transfer of the litigious rights, authorize the purchaser's participation in the proceeding (either as the transferor's successor, either as their assistant) and bind the transferee to the effects of the judgment and subjective limits of res judicata. All in favor of the system's proper operation. At the end and finally, the dissertation shall expose the different procedural reflects that may result from this transfer act – whether as regards the parties' standing, whether in relation to the powers of such characters in the proceeding – and further it shall discuss the complex issues involving the extent of the effects of the award and res judicata to the purchaser that is not aware of the litigiousness of the acquired good |
