Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Flocco, Rosíris
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Passarelli, Lílian Maria Ghiuro
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24831
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation has as its theme the importance of the types of arguments in the legal discourse and the need to deepen the study about the linguistic elements used in this type of discourse and their possible meanings as an aid in the enunciator's argumentative construction processes. Therefore, the research proposes a linguistic analysis of the argumentative operators, precisely in the sample constituted by the legal opinion of the Council of Law and Religion about the functioning of churches in times of pandemic of COVID-19, in order to verify how the argumentative use of connectors occurs and the possible meaning effects. To this end, it combines law and language with a focus on argumentative operators from the perspective of Ducrot (1987) and Koch (2011). To achieve the objective, it discusses the concepts of language, Textual Linguistics, text, discourse and argumentation. In this way, the investigation chooses as its object of study the textual genre legal opinion, product of the speech of the lawyers who wrote the document. The listed references make it possible to understand the meaning effects of the argumentative operators used as mechanisms for cohesion and coherence in the legal discourse. Finally, we must note that, from the data collected, the proper use of argumentative strategies, as a way of persuading the speaker in front of the audience, makes the speech more forceful and effective, because it allows us to see beyond the grammatical and enunciative function of words |
