Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Nascimento, Eduardo Romualdo do
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Nucci, Guilherme de Souza |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18824
|
Resumo: |
At the same time technological progress brought uncountable benefits for human race, it also increased potential risk for the postmodern society and that is the reason why it is called risk society. Injuries to subject of the legal relation are exacerbated and tend to achieve a large number of people, sometimes unlimited. Law must not wait for injuries embodiment because it can be so severe that may result in subject-matter uselessness. In such context, apparent danger works as a way of inhibit dangerous conducts, reaping it before the production of clear danger. Amongst secured subject-matter are financial system, environment, public health and others, all of them of a collective character. Public health has been directly affected by use of intoxicants, which has been a common practice of human being for ages. Intoxicants have gained amplitude as an “escape” from stressful reality, a characteristic of contemporary life in risk society. The purpose of this thesis is establishing legal and illegal drugs apparent danger, in the context of carriage for personal use and trafficking. The work is indicating if there is, in fact, an assumption of danger on carriage which expresses a potential injury to public health, justifying criminalization. For this purpose, a bibliography research was carried out with national and foreign scholars, concentrating in four topics: a) constitutional principles, with emphasis on dignity of human person, b) subject-matter, c) drugs and d) danger, with emphasis on apparent danger. Following, there was a documental analysis, in particular, of three Ministers from Supreme Court´s votes until 2015, on trial of Extraordinary Appeal 635.659/SP, still ongoing, about unconstitutionality of Article 28 of Drug Prohibition Law. Those votes were analysed in the light of theoretical framework embraced at bibliography research. It brought to a conclusion that in Brazil, drugs legal practice is a matter of criminal policy and it is not in accordance with dogmatic aspects which should guide the subject. Main conclusion is that, concerning legal drugs, there is no apparent danger simply because it was only a criminal policy option, in other words, it means law opted not consider alcohol and tobacco dangerous for society. Illegal drugs are at the other edge and in addition to bring, itself, effective and clear danger, just like legal drugs, illegal drugs also carries apparent danger, because legislator made an option to confer a regulatory conception of danger. This drugs policy layout in Brazil generates inconsistency and distortions, especially concerning drug user and wholesale drug dealer. Furthermore, criminalization prevents to reach social objectives, since resources are allocated to combat traffic, detrimentally public health which is the subject protected by law |
