Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, Márcia Donizete Leite |
| Orientador(a): |
Zanotto, Mara Sophia |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13721
|
Resumo: |
This research aims to investigate the relationship between the prescribed work and achieved work of a teacher of higher education at a private university, more specifically for the teaching of certain program contents related to the discipline of Portuguese Language.The specific objectives of this study are to investigate what actions were prescribed and which were performed before and during the classes of the teacher and what resources were mobilized by him for the execution of his teaching activity. To achieve our goals, we will investigate possible modifications, reformulation or (re) conceptions of the teacher s actions, as well as some procedures performed by the teacher and how they occur in their daily practice.This investigation reveals factors that interfere directly and indirectly in the act of the teacher, which contributes to a greater understanding of teacher's work and may also lead him to a better interaction with students and with his collective. The understanding and clarification of this daily practice can contribute to a better understanding of collective work and conduct the teacher to find ways, methods, procedures and ways of action that can make his work more satisfying and therefore find ways of acting that can help him overcome any difficulties in his métier. This research of a qualitative/interpretive approach, has as the theoretical and methodological basis the Interactionism Sociodiscursive (ISD). To address issues related to teacher working: Bronckart (1993); Bronckart & Plazaolla (1998); Machado (1999); Bronckart & Machado (2004); Machado (2008); Guimarães & Machado & Coutinho (2007); Machado & Bronckart (2009); Machado, Lousada, Ferreira (2011); Faïta (2004; 2005); Amigues (2004); Saujat (2004); Bulea (2007; 2010); and for questions related to the prescribed work, to the achieved and real activity: Clot (1999/2006; 2010) and theoretical contributions of Ergonomics Activity.Data analysis is guided by audio recordings that constitute evidence of the prescribed work and of the performed by the teacher as the transcribed oral texts (interviews outside of the classroom) and sections of classes in which it occurs the teaching of the programmatic contents. The analysis of these excerpts can detect how the actions and teacher's procedures can conduct the teacher to (re)conception of his act. The results show that the teacher seeks to fulfill the institutional requirements, the selfprescriptions and his actions performed. However, in his teaching practice, he (re) develops numerous times his act, performs expected and unexpected actions and interacts with students through teaching resources to improve his teaching practice, this is the "real activity", the indicator that between prescribed work and performed there is much to investigate |
