Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Morais, Fernando Leite
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Dias, Ana Rosa Ferreira |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23051
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this research is to investigate, in the interaction between young people from the funk social group, which conversational strategies they use to defend their purposes more specifically, to analyze and explain, after transcribing our thirty seven minutes and two seconds corpus in recordings. , conversational strategies that occurred during these dialogues, focusing on conversational markers, their functions and positions within shifts; in slang, slang expressions, their meanings and formations; in slang metaphors and metaphors and their conceptualizations; among other elements that we come across in the effective analyzes, in order to establish the relationship between the young people in the group, reaffirm the social group to which these young people belong and highlight the identity issue that the sign brings to the group. Observing the way a group interacts allows us to identify how relationships occur and what the group participants' worldview looks like. The theoretical support of this study is limited to the area of Interactionist Sociolinguistics and Conversation Analysis. Authors such as Preti, Marcuschi, Goffman, Lakoff & Johnson, Guiraud, Dias, Kebrat Orecchioni, among others, will support our analysis. Preti's works (1984 2011), related to the study of orality, will support the correct orientations regarding the corpus transcription norms and with respect to the slang sign; Guiraud's work (1958) will support the study of the metaphor of nature; Dias's work (2008) will base questions regarding the perception of violence and slang metaphors; as well as Marcuschi's work (1989 2008) will do so with regard to the retextualization of speech to writing norms and Conversation Analysis. Similarly, so will Kebrat Orrechioni's (2006) work on conversation analysis; Lakoff & Johnson's (2002) works on conceptual metaphor; Horton and Hunt's work (1980) on social groups; among other works, which will also be absorbed throughout this research. In this investigation, we note that young people from the funk social group use metaphors, as well as slang and conversational markers, to architect and organize their conversational activity |
