Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Costa, Gilberto Azevedo de Moraes
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Nanni, Giovanni Ettore |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso embargado |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21722
|
Resumo: |
The present work has as objective to analyze the arras, legal institute that arose centuries ago and that over time was developed for the exercise of two antagonistic functions, depending on its legal nature, that is, the reinforcement and weakening of the bond legal. In other words, when it is confirmed, the sign reinforces the legal relationship between the parties, while being penitential, it weakens it, for it authorizes repentance. In spite of its remote existence and great practical use, the institute does not seem to have attracted the attention of the indoctrinates, especially the Brazilians, with scarce published material. It is for this reason that a dissertation on the subject is justified. The intention is to carry out, at first, a historical approach, in order to analyze the rule that was given by both the Civil Code of 1916 and the Diploma of 2002, comparing them. The research was based on doctrinal and jurisprudential material. The result is surprising, since it reveals that the changes, always punctual, make the institute stay alive and current, although its far-reaching foundation |
