O impedimento do direito de voto do cessionário na recuperação judicial

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Alfredo Cabrini Souza e
• Orientador(a): Sacramone, Marcelo Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito falimentar; Recuperação judicial; Direito de voto; Impedimento; Cessionário; Cessão de crédito; Transmissão; Conflito formal
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Bankruptcy law; Judicial recovery; Voting right; Restriction; Cessionary; Credit assignment; Transmission; Formalconflict
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39997

This dissertation aims to analyze the voting restriction of the cessionary creditor in the judicial recovery process. The cessionary creditor is the party who acquires a credit against the debtor in crisis and submits to the effects of the procedure in place of the cedent. The study seeks to question whether the voting restriction provided for in Article 43 of Law 11.101/2005 (Judicial Recovery and Bankruptcy Law - LRE), when applicable to a specific person, should be extended to the cessionary creditor. To achieve this goal, the peculiarities of the creditor prohibited from voting due to formal impediment will be examined, as well as the extension of the effects of this prohibition to the cessionary creditor. An analysis of the nature of the voting right and the restriction set forth in Article 43 of the LRE will be conducted, investigating the moment at which such restriction should be verified and how it is transmitted to the cessionary creditor. Considering that the restriction is a restrictive norm to the general voting right, demanding a strict interpretation, the dissertation will analyze the feasibility of ex post control of the vote cast by the cessionary creditor as a means to preserve their deliberation in the general meeting of creditors. The thematic relevance of this study lies in the fact that the LRE is silent on this specific issue, making it necessary to reflect on the possible impacts caused by this practice. Furthermore, the expected results of this research can be significant for the secondary credit market, providing clear guidelines and legal certainty to cessionary creditors involved in judicial recovery processes