Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Sousa, Marcos Andrey de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Calças, Manoel de Queiroz Pereira |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8628
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation defends the delimitation of the applicable norm to rule the judicial constriction of private limited company share, having in mind the advent of the 2002 Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Code reforms ruled by Law number 11.382/2006, and the bankruptcy laws in force. This subject is relevant because it faces institutions which are important to the socio-economic society: the limited company, which is the most used societary type in this country; the business activity, with the social interests that surround it; and the trust recovery, which is supported nowadays by fundamental rights concerning actual jurisdictional guardianship. This subject choice is due to the criticism made by the distinguished doctrine arguing about the harm that bankruptcy can cause on business activity, reaching inherent social interests, not to mention the procedural hindrances in attaining the obligee s satisfaction. Furthermore, foreign legislations, which inspired the national ones, offer dedicated and specific solutions to companies comprised by people with unlimited responsibility, and to limited companies, showing the impropriety of supplementarily applying on them the simple society rules. This defence is supported by the invocation of principles to determine the normative meanings, to avoid antinomies and to delimitate the application of the most appropriate normative position. This work is developed through research of doctrine and legislations, both national and foreign, using descriptive language on the analysis of legislations, and prescriptive language to build up the defended position |