Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2006 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Domingues, Fabio Araujo |
| Orientador(a): |
Junqueira, Luciano Prates |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Administração
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contábeis e Atuariais
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/1181
|
Resumo: |
Along with the evolution of markets, mainly since globalization, investors began to claim more detailed information on investment and financing qualities given by companies and banks, where the transparency and stability of information become then, essential elements for the efficient appliance for corporative and administrating practices. This present dissertation had, as main objective, to study the company s shares, negotiated at BOVESPA, compromised with corporative administration, and to check if this differential had been positive to its shares. For this reason, this work studied and presented results on the following aspects: the first was a study of the twenty-two companies which nowadays form the New Market, checking the evolutional behavior of each one s shares; the second, a comparative analysis between the IGC index of the companies compromised with corporative administration and the IBOV index composed of traditional market companies not compromised with these practices; and third and last, an analysis between the two compromised companies with corporative administration against two companies of the same productive or economic sectors, without an implemented corporative administration, checking if an appreciable divergence occurred because of this positioning. While presenting the results obtained, we could notice that, we can only confirm that the difference is limited to segment the environment in which the company is positioned, or elsewhere, situating them in the New market or the Traditional Market, as also specifying the organizational structure implanted in their managing, because, due to the variable diversity reaching the sector, as well as by the heterogeneous behavior presented by the companies being studied, we cannot certify that this differential is translated to a direct valorization of its shares after its adherence to this segment |
