Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Arsuffi, Arthur Ferrari
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Alvim, Thereza Celina Diniz de Arruda |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21884
|
Resumo: |
This work has as goal the analysis of the brazilian discovery (produção antecipada de prova), specially its duties on the Brazilian System of laws and its legal limitations. The focus of the study is on the identification of what the Brazilian discovery procedure (produção antecipada de prova) can collaborate with the conflict resolution system, always aiming bigger efficiency. Therefore, it was necessary to define the legal nature of the brazilian Discovery (produção antecipada de prova), as well as situate the doctrine in the light of the fundamental rules of the procedure, especially those as close as the adversary system, efficiency and collaboration. After this initial part, it was possible to identify the brazilian Discovery procedure duties on the brazilian conflicts resolution system, showing its vantages and its usage limits. At last, the main questions about the procedure dynamic was adressed, as much as initial petition, the possibility of conceding injunctions, defense limits and the refutation of decisions ways on the brazilian discovery (produção antecipada de prova) course. With that, its purpose was not to give just the theoric concept, but a pratic concept of the procedure in a way to collaborate with its usage also on the court daily basis |
