Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Mendes, Denis Canal
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Faria, Durval Luiz de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22725
|
Resumo: |
The present work is a master's research carried out in PUC/SP, in the Program of Postgraduate Studies in Clinical Psychology, in the Núcleo de Estudos Junguianos-NEJ, within the field of Jungian Psychology, with analysts members of the official Jungian societies of Latin America (IAAP). This research is structured in such a way as to reveal what is the Red Book (L.V.) presenting a review of publications from the period 2009 to 2018, emphasizing the relevance of this study. We present the objective, which is to study the role of L.V. in the clinical practice of the Jungian analysts and the method, which is characterized by a mixed methodology: both quantitative and qualitative. The research was carried out in two stages: to quantitatively understand the role of L.V. and later, qualitatively understand the meaning of L.V. in the clinical work of the Jungian analyst. In the first quantitative phase, a questionnaire was sent, via email, using the surveymonkey.com platform to all 378 Latin American Jungian analysts. At this stage, only 91 analysts were willing to answer the 12 questions in the research questionnaire. It was observed in the quantitative phase that all the analysts considered important to study the L.V. and that 65% of them changed their perception, both in relation to theory and in relation to clinical practice after the reading of L.V. In the second phase of the qualitative research were conducted 9 semi-directed interviews with the selected analysts from the quantitative phase (CRESWELL, 2007). In the results and analysis phase, from the narratives of these analysts, we created four thematic groups: I-Clinical Practice, II-Jung, III-Living Theory and IV-Depth. In the next stage, the themes of the thematic groups were analyzed from the analysts' narratives, adopting Bardin's content analysis technique (1975/2016), adapted by Faria (2003), corresponding themes that emerged and were analyzed in the light of approach in the context of research (PENNA, 2013). The study shows that the L.V. describes the living testimony of the process of elaboration of Jungian concepts, especially the expressive techniques and the active imagination, as well as the living account of the construction of the Jungian work |
