Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gomboeff, Ana Lucia Madsen
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Aguiar, Wanda Maria Junqueira de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Formação de Formadores
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20697
|
Resumo: |
This investigation adopted as general objective learn the role of a director over the manager's team as of to understand which elements influence positively or negatively a collaborative work between the members of this team. We adopted the statements from Socio-Historic Psychology methodologic-theoric, scaffolded under the Dialectic-Historic Materialism, in particular the ones stated by Vigotski and its followers with highlight to the categories: Historicity, Mediation, Senses and meanings, subjectivity and activity. For the production of the information we used and iteractive interview a direction assistant that worked for a year as the School director. The research occurred in a Sao Paulo`s municipal school, voluntarily becoming in 2005 the research site and as offspring of the study group named after "Grupo de Atividade Docente e Subjetividade (GADS), from the "Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo" (PUC-SP). In front of its compromise, the GADS made 4 meetings in this school, in 2016, comprehending the managing team. Those meetings were recorded and transcribed promoting dialogue theoricallys caffolded for which the ones taking part of the meeting could develop under the process of critically understanding their own way of thinking, feeling and doing. It was mainly the transcription of one of these meetings that worked as secondary data for this work, with the intention of guiding the elaboration of “guiding questions” used on the first interview. The information interpretation analysis happened by the means of a process called "Núcleos de Significado" as proposed by Aguiar and Ozella (2006; 2013; 2015). The analysis showed that the managing team intends to work collaboratively but that does not happen. One factor that could favor the collaborative work between the managing team and all of the school would be the fact of managers to gather weekly to discuss the promoting of the active managing in the school and also to plan and execute the teacher’s formation, under the light of their formative needs and the PPP. Unfortunately this does not occur given to the fact that the coordinators do not understand their main function. Which means to get together all of the segments for the construction and execution of a common ideal, expressed by the means of the PPP, focused on the development of the education quality and taking the responsibility for the teacher’s formation. As much as the municipal law and the formation offered, make it more difficult for the collaborative work to happen. The laws do not offer material condition so that the segments of the school can get together to discuss the PPP. The formation aimed at the direction exclusively reinforces the idea that it is yours the unique responsibility for the teachers and pedagogic therefore dividing the team. The fact that the direction and its assistants did not participate on the formation of the teachers is very worrying looking at the relevance of the reflection and the questioning over the school day-by-day looking after development and transformation. This way it is possible to question if São Paulo’s educational politic values the collaborative work and provides objective condition for it to happen |
