Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lovatto, Angelica
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Almeida, Lúcio Flávio Rodrigues de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
| Departamento: |
Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4175
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this research was to analyse the Cadernos do povo brasileiro , published between 1962 and 1964, and arranged in 28 books. This publication was sponsored in ISEB Instituto Nacional de Estudos Brasileiros (1955-64), by Civilização Brasileira Publishing House. Our objective was to analyse the social function of that publication in the period of nationalist-reformism, during the government of João Goulart, in which occurred discussions of structural reforms in the brazilian society. The intensive popularization of that collection made feasible those discussions, in a moment of strong politicization. The questions that oriented this research were: 1) Have the authors correlated the nationalism to the democratic struggle in a subordinated social formation, granting to it a socialist character, or have them presented this nationalism only as a popular movement, reducing the meaning of this social formation through the elimination of its class character?; 2) Have the Cadernos do povo brasileiro represented an advancing of popular movements in the period before-1964, or have them been a simple reproduction of an advertising of turmoil movement? Our hypothesis regarding the first question is that both cases are present on the collection, although it predominated the idea of a popular democratic struggle, instead of a socialist movement. Our hypothesis regarding the second question is that this publication established an important social function in the social struggles of the period |
