Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Braga, Karen Costa
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Balera, Wagner |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20415
|
Resumo: |
The objective of this study is to demonstrate that Social Security, as it is governed by the values of the dignity of the human person, social solidarity and equality and in view of the constitutional norms of the universality of coverage and service (Art. 94, I) and Prohibition of the adoption of differentiated criteria in the granting of pensions in the RGPS (art.201, paragraph 1), can not restrict the additional 25% of the value of the benefit provided for in article 45 of Law 8213/91 only to insured persons retired due to disability. In this sense, the work examines the legal hermeneutics that should be used by the legislator in the formulation of social security legislation as well as the form of interpretation of the applicators of the law. Finally, it maintains that the existing social security conflict would only be remedied if there were a legislative reformulation that expressly stated in the Benefit Law (Law 8,213 / 91) the possibility of extending the additional 25% for other types of social security benefits, if there was proof of fulfillment of the requirements in the event of incidence of the norm (work incapacity and the need for permanent assistance of a third party) |
