Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Muneiro, Lilian Carla
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Ferrara, Lucrecia D'Alessio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Comunicação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4238
|
Resumo: |
Mass communication means produce a symbolic content, previously organized and diffused, intending to establish bounds with the public. This work researches political and cultural characteristics of the national hero and how the media interferes on them. It departs from the hypothesis that the media intervenes on nationalist interests, and exposes the official reasons of the project, producing translations and/or caricatures of the politically planned hero. The analysis of these translations allows the study of real or possible interventions of the mediations in the construction of the national imaginary. Thus, it intends to search the translation characteristics of the hero fomented by the State, which manifest in different communicative vehicles and go through ways that vary from nationalism to caricature. The description of the social, political and cultural context that exposed the emergency of the State is an indispensable step for the definition of the problem that will be investigated: the differences of the hero s process of mediatization that, generated in the State-Nation ambit, have been recovered in several process of mediation. Considering the comparative historic method, the corpus of this research contemplates characters originated by the newspaper (narrative), the literature, the cinema and the television. The theoretical background is supported by the concepts developed by Vladimir Propp (2002) and Mikhail Bakhtin (2002), through the dialog structure of the culture and the carnivalization; by the Greimasian Semiotics (the enunciator and the enunciatee with their specific enunciation strategies); by Ferrera (2008) through the spatial theory; by Baudrillard (1991), through the vision, simulation and simulacrum of the image; by Stuar Hall (2006) and Manuel Castells (2002), with the issues related to modern and post-modern identity; besides the readings of the national reality developed by Alfredo Bosi (2006), Sérgio Buarque de Holanda (2006), Gilberto Freire (2005), Antonio Candido (1974), Octávio Ianni (1994), José Murilo de Carvalho (1990), among others |
