Os especialistas em educação para a América Latina (1958-1966)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2010
Autor(a) principal: Maluhy, Cláudia Vercesi lattes
Orientador(a): Bittencourt, Circe Maria Fernandes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade
Departamento: Educação
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10278
Resumo: The Main Unesco Project Number 1, presented in May 1956 during the Latin-American Regional Conference on Charge-Free and Mandatory Elementary Education, had as central aims: the broadening of elementary school, the eradication of illiteracy and teachers training. Interested in assisting the Project implementation, between 1958 and 1966, the Centro Regional de Pesquisas Educacionais de São Paulo (CRPE/SP), in agreement with the United Nations, Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (Unesco), the Instituto Nacional de Estudos Pedagógicos (Inep), and the Universidade de São Paulo (USP), organized the Cursos de Especialistas em Educação para a América Latina (CEEAL), focused on the university education for educators (administrators, supervisors, specialists in curricula, advisors, principals, etc.) from 19 Latin-American countries. To understand CEEAL aims and organization, which is the main object of the present work, we have described and analyzed Unesco documents, CRPE/SP publications, monographs written by the participants, and theoretical production of educators and socialists somehow involved with the issue. From all those presented documents, we have tried to reconstruct the historical process that originated those courses, answering the questions related to the political and economical role given to the primary school during the 1950 s, as well as their relationship with ―developmental‖ ideologies and the defense of the democratization of education