Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Varella, Márcia
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Ag Almouloud, Saddo |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação Matemática
|
| Departamento: |
Educação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10844
|
Resumo: |
This study aims to analyze how the authors of teaching materials of high school have organized tasks proposals with proofs and demonstrations on content proposed of Analytic Geometry on 3rd series of high school. With a view to proposing some thoughts in this respect, we analyze the collections of textbooks approved by the National Program of textbook for high school (PNLEM/2009) and the notebooks bimonthly adopted by the Education Secretary of the State of São Paulo (SEESP/2009), made available to students and teachers, distinctly. We judge the relevance in analyzing these materials because we act in the public network of State of São Paulo aiming contributions that may occur. The analysis of these materials was carried out considering the tasks proposed on the content Analytic Geometry, limited to studying the equation of a line. The theoretical contribution that substantiate our analyses followed the assumptions of Anthropological Theory of didactic Yves Chevallard (1999) that focuses the study of praxeological organization mathematics and didactics designed for teaching and learning of Mathematics and the work of Nicolas Balacheff (1988), which aims to study the typology of proofs produced by students. Supported by this theoretical, we realize our analyses with the purpose of responding to our question: Which mathematics and didactics organizations involving proofs and demonstration are proposed for didactics materials of high school, on content Analytic Geometry? Answering this question, we developed a qualitative research with approach documentary and from survey bibliographic we might have idea of problems involved in the teaching and learning of proofs and demonstrations on mathematical content, both in elementary and high school. The analysis of these materials confirmed two of our research hypotheses and showed that the work with proofs and demonstrations in didactics materials was not abandoned, but the clarity of the terms belonging to deductive system is unsatisfactory for understanding of what is demonstration in Mathematics |
