Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2007 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Souza, Edson Bueno de |
Orientador(a): |
Manus, Pedro Paulo Teixeira |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7494
|
Resumo: |
The present study approches the theoretical and practical aspects of the means of evidence which are foreseen and/or allowed within the ambit of a labour process and, following that, some specifics considerations about the evidence achieved through illicit or atypical means were made. Its starting point was the historical evolution of the evidences, rapidly examined. In the sequence, the issues concerning the concept and the judicial nature of the evidences as well as the dogma of truth in the process were confronted. In the following stages the principles, classification and means of evidence were studied. Since the analysis of each typical means of evidence is not a part of the object of this study, really short comments were made about them. Continuous act was seen, also in a very brief passage, as well as the stages of the probatory activities and the moments and places in which they are produced. The instructional power of the judge and the onus of the evidence were studied in the sequence to address to the analysis of the value judgment of the means of evidence. At the final stages came the analysis of illicit and atypical evidences. The last chapter was dedicated to the practical management of the evidences within the labour process. The adopted method in this study was the research of national and foreign doctrines, as well as jurisprudence, especially from TST (Federal Labour Court) and STF (Supreme Court |