Angola e Brasil poder e discurso político: a constituição do ethos discursivo dos presidentes de Angola e do Brasil

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Mafra, Patrícia Martins
• Orientador(a): Bastos, Neusa Maria Oliveira Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
• Departamento: Língua Portuguesa
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Lusofonia; Semiolinguística; Ethos discursivo; Discurso político; Analise do discurso; Oratoria politica; Paises de lingua portuguesa; Collor, fernando > 1949-; Santos, Jose Eduardo dos > 1942-
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Lusophony; Discourse analysis; Semiolinguistic; Discursive ethos; Political discourse; Meaning effects
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS::LINGUA PORTUGUESA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14615

The objective, in this research, based on the discourse analysis (DA) of French line and the directions of the semiolinguistic with observation of the research of Maingueneau (2008) and Charaudeau (2008), is to analyze the constitution of the discursive ethos of presidential pronouncements of lusophone countries Angola and Brazil, in the 1990s. Specifically, the corpuses of the research are constituted by Mr. José Eduardo dos Santos pronouncement, President of the Republic of Angola, the signing of Lusaka s agreement, in 1994 and the pronouncement of Mr. Fernando Collor de Mello, President of the Federative Republic of Brazil, the swearing in ceremony of National Congress, in 1990. Therefore, this analysis aims to identify similarities and differences of the constitution of the ethos of already mentioned discourse, from the historical and situational context, the linguistic processes and social representations concerning legitimacy, through democratic elections, the credibility and identification of the political subject. The results show that there are similarities and differences in the construction of discursive ethos of the corpuses in question, and they point out different effects of meaning in the co-enunciators