Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Alvares, Diovani Vandrei
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Guimarães, Antonio Márcio da Cunha |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6420
|
Resumo: |
The current social relations show up remarkably, dynamic and globally, however it s not possible to sight significant efforts to address this issue in its entirety: to make a faster delivery adjudication of disputes with transnational feature. Brazil remains almost alien to this new reality a proof of it is the lack of doctrinal studies and jurisprudence regarding emergency situations when it comes in homologation of foreign sentences. This dissonance between the reality and speed of contemporary society and the judicial process is dangerous, in so far as it calls into question the legitimacy of the judiciary as a whole. Ensuring the tutored person, regardless of their nationality or the competent court for trial on the merits of the main action, the effective protection of their rights, it will be - allowing procedural science properly perform its goal: ensuring universal access to justice. To defender the positivization and implementation of enforcement of foreign judgments in preliminary proceedings; to grant incidentally to probate action for injunctive relief; as well as the wide possibility of granting interim relief in the headquarters of the foreign judgment ratifying procedure; glimpsing with such institutes, the guarantee to judicial effectiveness as a Fundamental Human Right, after all, is not sufficient to ensure judicial solution to all conflicts, what is essential is that this solution is actually " fair ", that is , able , useful and effective for the grant of the practice you are entitled to protect, according to the claimed need and putting under the judicial examination of the state. At this point, it is essential to analysis Project 166/10, which yields broad advances on the Institutes of Legal International Recognition of Foreign Judgments, Law and Guardianship Assistance Emergency Cooperation, however, a critical-dialectical view, points what could be the subject of further advancement |
