Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Domingues, Rafael Gouvêa
 |
Orientador(a): |
Iwashita, Kuniharu |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Teologia
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Teologia
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22033
|
Resumo: |
The main objective of this dissertation is to present sin to the present day from a pastoral point of view, and not only from a moral and spiritual perspective, revealing the pertinence of sin under this approach to the Christian life. Such a study is justified by the fact that sin has been neglected or misunderstood in contemporaneity, and relieved by psychological and environmental factors that attenuate its theological meaning. It is also justified by the rediscovery of the double dimensionality of sin in its individuality and collectivity. The very loss of the sense of sin and the causes that provoked it still corroborate in the justification of such a dissertation. The fundamental hypothesis is that sin remains as valid theological data for the present, with pastoral, moral and spiritual implications, and that the Church can greatly contribute to this awareness through different means. The theoretical-methodological aspects are the phenomenology abstracted from parochial pastoral experiences, regarding the sacramental and non-sacramental pastoral ministry of the Church. As a theological basis, some dogmatic treatises are presented: Christology, Soteriology, Ecclesiology. Other human sciences also subsidize this path: anthropology, philosophy and psychology. For this reason, there are vast bibliographies researched of various natures: ecclesial documents and declarations, several theologians and Sacred Scripture. The main results obtained were: knowledge of the multiple conceptions of sin present today; amplification of correlates to sin: guilt, forgiveness, crisis of faith, anthropological crisis, theological treatises, among others; the passage of the sin object to the sinful subject, envisioning a more human and integrated anthropological vision, in which theological anthropology clarifies, so that sin is not admitted only as a dark reality in human existence, but leads, by the mercy of God, the sinner to meet God effectively, in a serious process of conversion; the approach not only moral and spiritual, but above all, pastoral in relation to the reality of sin, without neglecting theology |