Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2005 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Andrade, Vitor Morais de |
| Orientador(a): |
Sodré, Marcelo Gomes |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6632
|
Resumo: |
The present work has the objective of deal with the main conflicts existing in the application of the administrative sanctions based upon the Consumer Defense and Protection Code. To analyze the punitive performance of the Public Administration that is done by means of the sanctions, we initially bring the generic concepts about the different faces of the subject sanction until the delimitation of the meaning and range of the administrative sanctions and how they are enforced based upon the Consumer Defense Code. In the sequence, we deal with the regulation of the procedures for the application of these sanctions. In this sense, we verify the absence of systematization on the side of the Public Agencies related to the National System of the Consumer Defense which applies the administrative sanctions, creating several doubts and conflicts taking as an example the divergences of prerrogatives between the regulation agencies and the administrative Public Agencies of the consumer protection and defense (well-known the Procons); the problem of the multiplicity of sanctions applied by the Public Agencies of the consumer protection and defense of the different municipalities and states, among other subjects. To deal with these themes and show a possible option to the solution of these conflicts was the objective of this work |
