Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Canavarros, Diana Alvim Pena
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Sério, Tereza Maria de Azevedo Pires
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia Experimental: Análise do Comportamento
|
| Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16852
|
Resumo: |
This study was carried out in order to analyze the behavior of self-control in children, comparing two types of procedure of gradual change: the procedure of gradual increase in the period of delay of greater reinforcement magnitude (fading in) and the procedure to decrease progressive period of delay in the reinforcement of smaller magnitude (fading out); for that, were analyzed competing schemes linked with components programmed for different magnitudes and delays of reinforcement. Ten children aged between seven and twelve years old participated in the study which involved activities on a computer with a program specially developed for this research. In the first link of the competitor chained scheme, a response in the selected component, producing, on a variable interval of 10 seconds, the second link in the chain, which consisted of a fixed time (the period of delay of reinforcement), in which the computer screen remained dark. The period of delay of reinforcement varied as the experimental condition programmed, from 1 second to 150 seconds. The third link in the chain was started with the appearance of a red square, and a response of clicking with the mouse produced the release of dots. All ten subjects participated in two initial conditions for the evaluation of sensitivity to differences in magnitude and delay of reinforcement. There were two different conditions of variation in the period of delay of reinforcement. Four participants were exposed to a condition in which the delays of the greater magnitude of reinforcement (3 points) were gradually increased (1s, 30s, 75s, 120s, 150s), while the component of lesser magnitude of reinforcement (1 point) remained constant, without variation (1s). Six participants were exposed to a condition in which the delays of the lower magnitude of reinforcement (1 point) were gradually decreased (150s, 120s, 75s, 30s, 1s, to four participants, 120s, 75s, 30s, 1s, for one participant, and 90s, 75s, 30s, 1s, for one participant), while the most important component of the increase (3 points) remained constant with the initial value of the sequence of delay indicated (150s, 120s and 90s, respectively). All ten participants showed differences in sensitivity in terms os difference of magnitude of delay of reinforcement, the two conditions of assessment, with some differences in the number of sessions per participant. In relation to the gradual increase of the delay of the greatest magnitude of reinforcement, the results show that most participants preferred for the component of impulsivity. In the condition of progressive reduction of the delay of the smaller magnitude of reinforcement, all six participants showed preference for the component of self-control. Only when the delay of the component of smaller magnitude of reinforcement decreased to 1 second, the majority of participants chose the component of impulsivity. It was found that the determinant factor is not the delay time itself, but the relative difference of values of delay between the two components |
