Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Damasceno, Wladimir Alberti Pascoal de Lima
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Friedman, Silvia |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Fonoaudiologia
|
| Departamento: |
Fonoaudiologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11929
|
Resumo: |
This paper starts from the assumption that there is a disharmony between speech (meaning) and language (form) in the stuttered discursive functioning. Based on discursive linguistics we understand that in a fluent in position, the speaker slides along the meaning of speech without any attention to the form of language; yet in a stuttered position he reminds occupied in trying to avoid stuttering and by acting like that he remains subdued to the form of language and looses the discursive position that would guarantee his fluency. Objective: To develop the understanding about disharmony between speech and language via the speech of adult stutterers. Method: Prospective qualitative research conducted through semi-structured interviews with six adults, following the key questions: what comes to mind when I say - speech ; to speak with fluency ; public speaking ; talking to myself ; what helps fluency ; what do you makes to not stutter or what helps you not to stutter ; do you know if you will stutter?, and what makes you know that you will stutter . After the speech transcription, the notion of discursive practices and production of meaning (Spink and Medrado, 2004) allowed us to define three categories that organized the results and guided the discussion: Sense Speech composed by the sub-categories: Positive and Negative; Context of Speech, composed by the sub-categories The Effect of Others and The Effect of Being Alone; and Anticipation of Stuttering. Results and Discussion: In Sense Speech-Positive respondents reported how they feel when they flow better in speech and when they allow themselves to stutter. Theirs vision of speech is the one that circulates in common sense. The respondents had an idealized view of fluency as absolute. In Sense of Speech-Negative respondents reported feeling dissimilar and marginalized by his manner of speaking, also reported emotions and feelings related to stuttering. We emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between the production of stuttering and the subjective position of a stigmatized speaker, to build up therapeutic approaches to overcome this position. In Context of Speech-The Effect of Others, respondents discriminated types of speakers and of discursive contexts that favored fluency or stuttering. They showed negative marks on subjectivity, because when they feel like stutterers they imagine the others monitoring their speech and able to reject or disapprove them. In Context of Speech-The Effect Alone respondents reported that when they are alone they can flow freely, which reiterates the stuttering as a manifestation strongly linked to the presence of others. In Anticipation of Stuttering respondents reveal the ways in which stuttering is expected subjectively before it is materialized in their speech: thoughts or views; emotions or feelings; actions of the body or linguistic strategies. Conclusion: The reports of the respondents indicates that the disharmony between speech and language, in stuttered speech, is related to a speaker who feels stigmatized in his subjectivity in face of certain conditions of discursive production; also indicates the different ways in which this disharmony is materialized in order to avoid the provided stuttering. These characteristics indicate some elements that seem important to the targeting of a therapeutic approach of stutter speech wishing to overcome the subjective/discursive functioning that sustains it |
