Determinação dos créditos na sistemática não-cumulativa do PIS e da COFINS incidentes sobre a receita (análise crítica e definição do termo insumo )

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Renato
• Orientador(a): Tomé, Fabiana Del Padre
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: PIS; Programa de Integração Social; COFINS; Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social; Não-cumulatividade; Determinação de créditos; Insumo
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Non-cumulativity; Determination of credits; Input
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6372

This work aims at analyzing the prescriptive statements of the positive law (directly or indirectly) related to the taxpayer s right to deduct credits in the non-cumulative system of the PIS and COFINS levied on revenues and, on the basis of the systematic interpretation of the Federal Constitution, the Ordinary Law, and the (administrative and judicial) Case Law, to construct legal criteria to guide the concretion of the constitutional principle of the non-cumulative system of such social contributions, further proposing a definition of the term input . Currently, the subject is recurrent and very controversial, especially regarding the semantic definition of the term input in the context of the non-cumulative system of the PIS and COFINS levied on revenues. In fact, we have been seeing constructions, mainly of the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service and the Judiciary Branch, limiting the determination of credits in the non-cumulative system of the PIS and COFINS levied on revenues, based on (factual and legal) assumptions that, from our standpoint, do not reflect the provisions of paragraph 12, article 195, of the 1988 Federal Constitution, and Laws No. 10637/2002 and No. 10833/2003. Thus, based on the assumptions of the Logical-Semantic Constructivism Theory we will seek to demonstrate that the non-cumulative system of the PIS and COFINS levied on revenues have specific legal rules that distances it from the non-cumulative system of the IPI and ICMS, and also from the legal system of costs and operating expenses deductibility for the purpose of ascertainment of the IRPJ and CSLL taxable bases, in addition to delimiting the taxpayers right to credit and the definition of the term input