Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Batista, Lilian Clementoni
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pacheco Filho, Raul Albino |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
|
| Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/17003
|
Resumo: |
We aim to research the subject as theorized by Jacques Lacan in the face of social and economic transformations, especially in capitalism. The subject for Lacan is formed in the social bond and inexorably alienated with respect to the desire of the Other, so he is not socially inserted a posteriori. In the same sense, but from different theoretical foundations, it is possible to extract that the subject, to the Marxian theory, is also social from the origin: culture names the social condition of mankind, which has its genesis in the transformation of nature by the work. However, the subject outlined by Lacanian psychoanalysis is structurally formed from impossibility, as illustrated by Lacan's assertion that "there is no sexual relationship." This structural crack is the condition for the emergence of culture and promotes the occurrence of the symbolic exchanges: there it is simultaneously established the social bond and the emergence of language. This impossibility, this hole, can never be grasped by the subject, but it will be encompassed through language, which will make its edge. The subject exists in this nuance, in which a significant flings over the other in seeking to represent it. Then we understand that language is what the subject acquired in exchange for entering into the culture, for the impossibility of achieving this hole, which is his eternal division because there is something that always escapes him, from the order of the real. For Lacan's theory of discourse presented in the seminar, book 17, we investigate from the master's discourse - the discourse of entering the language - the existence of a loss that is renewed in each repetition. In preparing this speech, Lacan uses the concept of homology with the surplus-value of Karl Marx for the formalization of the concept of surplus-jouissance, the product of the repetition of the work of unconscious, whose loss is not calculated. For this, we enter the theory of surplus-value of Karl Marx and reflect on the constitution of the subject that passes by history and the conditions that make such structure crossing history produce so peculiar socio-economic forms, such as capitalism. Then Lacan‟s theory of discourses is necessary for understanding the discursive forms that prevail in certain historical moments, not for setting a new subject, but subjectivities of an era |
