Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Vieira, Filipe Pereira
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Naffah Neto, Alfredo
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39471
|
Resumo: |
The present master's dissertation belongs to the institutional project "Challenges in mental health, sustainability and subjectivity in the contemporary world", approved in the "Call CNPq 2/2021", inserted in the "Agenda 2030", according to the "17 Sustainable Development Goals" (SDGs). This project is based on the conception that, currently, the experience of a sustainable subjectivity implies the adoption of interdisciplinary methods and techniques and, above all, a research approach aimed at the rigorous analysis of new risks that do not cease to reconfigure the boundaries between normal and pathological, subjective and objective dimensions, as well as nature and culture. In this sense, the fundamental aspects that serve as a basis for this institutional project are: 1. describing and evaluating, in a systematic and comparative way, the therapeutic principles of different psychoanalytic lineages; 2. analyzing the possibilities of subjective support in face of the challenges of the contemporary world (such as, for example, the frontiers between art and science, individualism and narcissism, helplessness and loneliness, among other impasses related to the field of mental health). From this point on, the guiding thread of this work is to situate the contributions on the theme of the use of "psychoanalytic interpretation" for Melanie Klein and Donald W. Winnicott. To sustain this proposal, selected fragments of the cases Richard and Piggle, published in full by Klein and Winnicott, respectively, are used as reference. Thus, a comparative study is proposed, by means of a theoretical-clinical methodology. However, it is not a deterministic and closed reading, but a general reflection of both theories. In this way, the objective is to outline a work proposal that demonstrates the resonances and dissonances of authors who belong to the so-called "English School of Psychoanalysis", but that, nevertheless, have deeply singular thoughts, allowing the emergence of significant contributions to psychoanalytic practice, which inevitably calls for an encounter with the unknown, demanding from the analyst a plural listening, aligned to the particularities that constitute each of these two lineages (Kleinian and Winnicottian) |
